Hi all-
I guess I'm hoping there's someone reading this forum that has tried both. I currently have a 4-5 year old Hauppauge NTSC PCI PVR card. I run Vista Ultimate. I have a two monitor (both 19 inches) setup and often watch TV in one monitor while I surf the web on the other. With my cable provider (comcast) really reducing the number of analog channels to make room for more HD channels, and since they have quite a few channels in clear QAM, I'm interested in getting a clear QAM TV Tuner (with NTSC too.)
Since I've had pretty good luck with Hauppauge (mine broke once, but they sent a free replacement- 3 years after I bought it!), I'm looking at Hauppauge again. Okay, so my question is:
Is there any reason to go with the internal PCI-E card (HVR-1800) over the USB HVR-950Q? I like the idea of USB- if a lightning storm comes it will be easier to disconnect the cable. Plus, I only have to plug the cable into one jack on the USB to tune both analog and Clear QAM - where I have to plug it into two jacks (via a splitter I presume) on the 1800 card. And of course it will be easier to switch the 950Q between PCs- can even use it on a laptop of course...
If the 1800 changes channels faster, or has a better picture, I'd happily go with the 1800. Or, if using the 950Q takes a lot more CPU compared to the 1800, that would be a reason to go with the 1800. Otherwise, I might as well go with the 950Q.
Thanks much if anyone has any insight! AL
ps- running 32 bit Vista Ultimate with a 3.0 GHz 45nm Core 2 Duo 8400 & 4 GB ram (yes, I know I'm not using all of the 4 GB...)