MrNorth:
Hi!
After enabling the proper flag the tv shows looked a lot sharper and black appeared to be black, well too black. When watching a tv show with two us cops in black uniforms they where all black no detail at all.
Which "flag" did you enable?
Personally I have found it is just about impossible to get the calibration right without using calibration videos. There is a surprisingly large amount of TV content where the grey levels are not correct.
MrNorth:So I started the calibration video in media center, and confirmed that no moving x was visible, and the shirt was also just one tone of black no details. So on my HDTV I increased the brightness (not the CCC controls) until the moving x disappeared and now I could see the details in the shirt. I still think the black is a little too black when watching live tv, but perhaps it is because I am used to watch washed out content.
Try Ian Kennedy's calibration source wmv (levels.wmv I provided a link to it over on avsforums.com above - maybe Ian will make it available again from his personal server at ). Instead of simply showing an X or a shirt without information on what levels you are calibrating to, it includes a complete ramp from absolute black (0) on the left to white (255) on the right. It also includes brackets to indicate where the 16-235 range is and provides a contrasting box like feature that helps to really show if anything outside of 16-235 is being displayed.
You want to calibrate your system so the range from 16-235 is visible. Below 16 should also be black (same as 16) and above 235 should (theoretically) be white (same as 235). Note that it is not always ideal, nor necessary to make 235-255 the same saturated white. With some TVs, if you calibrate so 235 is full brightness white it may simply be too bright or may be forcing your TV to work too hard (potentially introducing distortion and/or reducing the life cycle).
Ian had previously hosted his calibration sources at:
MrNorth:HTSlider: U said that the calibration video was incorrect. Howcome it "feels" I calibrated correctly since the picture looking so much better now. Exactly what did I calibrate when I did the above procedure? I didn't have time to recalibrate using DVE or THX optimizer... perhaps this weekend. My gf at least said the picture was much better now without the grey fog. So someone is happy :)
I'm not sure. I do wonder if possibly a different wmv compression type is being used with the VMC calibration sources vs Ian's calibration sources and if it is possible that it is only on some systems that the VMC calibration sources are incorrect. The other possibility is that someone at Microsoft simply made a mistake when putting together the calibration videos.
Whatever the reason, I have calibration sources in dvr-ms file formats for both HD and SD as well as confirmed calibration using my AVIA calibration DVD. Ian's levels.wmv calibration video does produce exactly the same calibration as the AVIA cal DVD, my SD dvr-ms cal sample, my HD dvr-ms cal sample, as well as the HD-DVD and Bluray calibration discs I have. The Vista Media Center calibration samples are the only ones that don't match; on my two Vista PCs at least (one with an Nvidia card, the other with an ATI card; both are using the default Vista SP1 MPEG-2 decoder too). I haven't really dug into the VMC calibration sample issue much though. Once I found they didn't match, I stopped using them.
EDIT: I decided to retest my main HTPC (driving our HDTV) using the VMC calibration sources. To my surprise, with ATI's latest drivers and Microsoft's latest patches, the Brightness.wmv file is showing the correct brightness level (black levels) when played within Media Center (and WMP). The Contrast.wmv file on the other hand is still incorrect and the white shirt includes levels well above 235. Essentially, if I was to calibrate using the VMC calibration source, I would end up with the range 16-255 being visible (not the correct 16-235 that Ian's calibration source shows my system is currently calibrated for).
It is too bad that Microsoft decided to use the wmv file format to calibrate the playing of dvr-ms files in Media Center. With dvr-ms files (mpeg-2) being fully decoded and processed by the video card's GPU and wmv files being decoded and processed by a combination of software and hardware, this seems to be almost asking for trouble.
Ultimately if your system behaves the same as mine (today), the Brightness.wmv file can be used to confirm black levels are correct (at least without any registry edits in use other than UseBT601CSC=1). The Contrast.wmv file is still incorrect though (on my system at least).
EDIT2: I just retested my "Study" Vista PC (driving a Viewsonic monitor) using the VMC calibration sources and all of the latest patches/drivers. Here too these are now trying to calibrate for a 16-255 range (instead of the correct 16-235 range).
Stranger than that, by uninstalling all video drivers, running Driver Sweeper to clean out all traces of video drivers, and installing the latest Nvidia driver again - now grey levels ARE consistent between all applications on this PC. Prior to this they were all over the place, including different between VMC and WMP. Unfortunately, even with the ehpresenter registry edits, for some reason video grey levels are not being expanded anywhere anymore (they were prior to running Driver Sweeper). Since the Viewsonic monitor is calibrated for 0-255, Recorded TV (and other video) needs to be expanded from the source 16-235 range into 0-255 so it will display correctly. On this system with this Nvidia video card (6800 PCIe) and latest drivers, it is currently impossible to get 16-235 visible for video without screwing up photographs and PC applications. Hopefully Nvidia's newer cards don't have this issue when the output is a PC monitor...
BTW, I did try to install my ATI HD2600XT in the Study PC, but there seems to be a major bug somewhere with the ATI X200 onboard video conflicting with the ATI HD2600XT when Vista is being used. I can dual boot into MCE2005 and the 2600XT works fine, but booting into Vista, it bogs down to a crawl (15 minutes to boot and just about non-responsive after that). Even with the on-board X200 disabled, the ATI driver installation log shows it recognizes the video card as an X200 and installs the X200 driver. If I manually force the installation of the HD2600XT driver, it does "seem" to install but the system suffers from the same extreme sluggishness and non-responsiveness. Note that with the Nvidia 6800 installed Vista works fine (except the 6800 has limited video processing capabilities and can only "just" play 720p).
STB w/R5000HD USB I/O, Gigabyte GA-P35-DS4, Quad Q6600, 4.0 GB RAM, ATI HD 3870 512MB, Ultra XVS 600W PSU, 3x SATA 500GB, 2x SATA 300GB, LG GGC-H20L, PVR-250, Toshiba 51H83 (51" HDTV), Yamaha RX-V2400 Amp, 5x Energy Speakers, SVS Sub, Harmony 880 Remote