Hate to say it, but this was one of my first concerns when the HD-PVR came out. Every one was like:
HD-PVR = h.264
and D*TV=h.264
and MS support D*TV
thus MS support HD-PVR
is True.
No. No it's not. It's just wishful thinking. To my knowledge, MS has never said anything regarding h.264 and Media Center. EVERYTHING that has be said regarding h.264 and Media Center has been INFERRED from the D*TV annoucement. While it would be great, and about frakking time, it is not a given. Mpeg2 is such a PITA with HD files!
QAM support would be a plus, definitely. But h.264 support is essential after the digital transistion. That, plus the fact that most GPU's have some sort of facility for rapid transcoding built in, the question is not why h.264, but why not?
Edit: Besides, didn't the D*TV announcements mention a Xmas'08/Q1'09
release date for Directv. IF the Fiji release is immanent, then we may
all be in for a let down!
bjdraw:With Fiji so close, my pessimistic side starting making me wonder, How big of a disappointment would Fiji be without DirecTV?
I mean, what if for whatever reason h.264 wasn't as easy as they thought it was and conversely DirecTV and HD PVR support got pushed back to Window 7?
Would the update even be worth it if all they did was add native QAM support and some new HD recording features?
And with the HD PVR out, and the still relatively limited availability of CableCARD tuners (not to mention the uncertainty surrounding SDV), without DirecTV this could cause a paradigm shift away from Media Center.
New System: Vista/AthlonX2BE/GigabyteGA-MA69G-S3H/HD3450/(2) M780/3GB Ram/320GB&750GB Drive/Westy 32 LCD via HDMI/
Old System: MCE/ Athlon3000+/Asus K8NE Deluxe/vBox Catseye 150/NVTV Dual SD/2GB RAM/250GB HD/Ahanix DVine 4/Westy 32 LCD/